Among changes (and changes of emphasis) in his first year, Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu stressed something as basic as shooting better.
Putting metal on target more often. Something that takes time, practice, and money.
Shoygu broached the issue while reviewing last summer’s exercises in the Eastern and Central MDs.
Shoygu told the assembled brass:
“In the first place, it concerns poor results in destroying targets from TO&E weapons. One of the main causes of this is an insufficient quantity of ammunition allocated for combat training of brigades according to existing norms. We already talked about this problem. Therefore today we need to adopt a clear mechanism to resolve it.”
Shoygu spoke publicly about the need to increase ammunition expenditure “by several times” from the current norm of 20 rounds per tank or artillery crew. And more explicitly:
“Our colleagues in other countries shoot 160 shells a year per crew. We have to increase our indicator at least five times. We have every possibility for this.”
He and his subordinates mulled the irony that Russia destroys old munitions while not enough new ones are manufactured. Deputy Defense Minister Yuriy Borisov said more money is going to ammunition production.
However, NVO’s Viktor Litovkin noted a different problem — practice firings too routine for crews to learn anything about shooting in combat:
“The first deficiency on which Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu focused is ‘we still shoot poorly.’ The causes here are several. One of them is the fact that tankers, as a rule, conduct combat firings from training tanks. Three-four of them per battalion. The tank range on the brigade training area has been studied down to the last knoll, so that every sight setting is thoroughly well-known. And how to fire at what distance. And all targets are well-known. Behind the sight of a TO&E tank, on unfamiliar terrain, people are lost. And unacceptable mistakes ensue.”
So, the military leadership is more occupied with the quantity than the quality of training.
There’s a personnel policy connection here too, curiously unmentioned by the leadership.
There are legions of former conscripts who rarely, if ever, fired live rounds from weapons locked in storage rooms of the barracks during their year of service. But the planned expansion of contract service should produce many enlisted who stay long enough not only to learn to shoot better themselves, but to teach other contractees and conscripts.
Then there’s always technology.
Recently, Mil.ru reported that the Central MD’s Samara-based peacekeeping brigade [15th Independent Motorized Rifle Brigade] increased the effectiveness of fire training by 20 percent after introducing laser simulators into the process.
This isn’t the first time the army’s used simulators, but it isn’t noted often.
It shouldn’t be news. It’s been 34 years since the U.S. Army started using MILES. What’s surprising is how late this technology is reaching Russian troops. Mil.ru indicated the 15th IMRB got its simulators through new 2013 procurement.
The system is standard fare. It looks a tad cumbersome, but it can reportedly be used with any infantry weapon, grenade launcher, or ATGM.
Russia is not so far behind in the technological sense, but more so in simply producing and using laser simulators.
One short dissertation says work on laser simulators began at TsKB Tochpribor in 1986. Simulators for infantry weapons, BMPs, and tanks were fielded quickly. The author concludes Soviet ones didn’t lag behind their U.S. or NATO counterparts.
But (he doesn’t note) just around the corner were the USSR’s disintegration and a long hiatus in Russian military procurement.
Still, Tochpribor stayed at the problem, developing new simulators (especially lighter ones) and an automated combined arms training system for up to 900 infantrymen and 180 combat vehicles called Barelef-SV, which passed state testing in 2008.
But domestic development and production like Tochpribor’s cannot fare well against Germany’s Rheinmetall and its €100-million-plus contract to build Moscow a brigade-sized live combat simulation and marksmanship training center slated to open this year in Mulino.
Parts of Russia’s defense industry are getting protection from the possibility of foreign competition (opened up by ex-Defense Minister Serdyukov), but apparently not this part.
Not that Tochpribor and Rheinmetall are in the same league. The latter’s a world class designer and integrator of military simulators. A system like that intended for Mulino is network-intensive, and it’s probably beyond Tochpribor’s competence.
This isn’t only about ammunition allocation. Most ammunuition in stock is full power ammunition meant for wartime use, and this means cannons are going to wear out accordingly.
Tank crews can still shoot shaped charge shells instead of the more eroding armour piercing fins stabilized shells, but the life of a 125 mm tank gun barrel is still only in the hundreds of shots.
It’s safe to assume hat many barrels are partially worn out due to 20 years of insufficient budgets. A more intense gunnery training means not only more consumption of obsolete war stocks, but also budget requirements for tank gun barrels.
Nice post and I would just mention two related ideas. Better to send this ammo down range than to have it blow up in some poorly controlled ammo dump. Serdyukov took a beating in the media every time one of these stockpiles blew up. Secondly, consuming ammo is also good for those in the ammo business. Russia (USSR) once had the largest facilities on the planet for producing ammunition and my guess is that there are still a number of facilities involved in this production. Producing, buying and exploding ordinance is one way to show ‘progress’ and maintain higher levels of employment.
Mil.ru rehashing the 15th IMRB story again…http://function.mil.ru/news_page/country/more.htm?id=11990109@egNews.